Reply to “On the stimulation depth of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils” Academic Article uri icon

abstract

  • We read with great interest the recent Letter by Deng et al.(2015) following our recent paper (Roth et al., 2014), and we thank them for the opportunity to clarify the issues. In their Letter the authors refer to the values of d½ as defined in their previous review (Deng et al., 2013) for the Magstim figure-8 coil (Magstim P/N 9925, 3190, d½= 1.41) and for the double cone coil (Magstim P/N 9902, d½= 1.98). That review considered some H-coils versions, such as the H2 coil (d½= 2.32) and the HADD coil (d½= 2.43). These values of d½ are …

publication date

  • April 1, 2015